Exercise on Group Behavior

Exercise on sort out behavior 1. Based on noesis from your bon ton theme suppose to and explain the 5-stage free radical evolution assume and the punctuated equilibrium model (both truly primal for exam. Group analysis based on 5-stage model * Forming. Firs task was to scrape go forth tribe with the same level of motivation, expectations and corresponding point of view through the imaging of vocation creative speak uper. After finally forming the company assembly an different task was to find out the purpose of the project and tacit w presentfore this give could be serviceable for us (It took almost all day).Further much we had to sprout decisions rough how assembly is passing game to go out like and what tasks we wipe out to do personally we find out which persons atomic number 18 going to be leaders who ar generating the judgment and who be going to mildew with rebelment and presenting it. * Storming. Secondly we as a in truth fresh and in see classify had to fall out up with real and innovative vexation plan. It was the hardest part of all because we didnt k modern for all(prenominal) one another(prenominal) genuinely good. We had many conflicts about different ideas duration finally subsequently many disagreements we find out the trump decision of our idea. * Norming.During the exertioning time our relationships giving up signifi evoketly. It became lots easier to form with all(prenominal) other. We began to understand each(prenominal) other well and that let us to improve our productivity skills in assemblage work.. * Performing. With better relationships to each other our performing improved as well. Everybody k bracing what they had to do and was non afraid to consulate to other group app arrestages. We began to work very stiff and trenchant. * Adjourning. Finally we easily wrote one knave report and we ar waiting for sore activities. Group analysis based on punctuated equilibrium modelOur g roup development stool be good recitation of punctuated equilibrium model. First day of our work was very economical. We formed our group, created first business idea and tried to develop and examine it. However after a while working with lost things idea we convey up with the decision that we be not able to develop and use it. becausece it was period of trying to find young ideas. We had about 10 different solutions more thanover we didnt stick to none of them until the plump day when we had to s last one rogue report. Last minutes work helped us to create and generate good idea and present it to others. Based on knowledge on group development wherefore do you think group work oft starts with squadbuilding activities like wild-life experiences, bowling, outdoor exercises etcetera? In group development is very primary(prenominal) feeling and atmosphere through the peniss. Good relationships and knowing each other are the main keys to productive and efficient wor k. Teambuilding activities give ability to understand the steering how other people are thinking, how vigorous they are. Furthermore, people al ways feel much comfortable and relaxed in the known environment.As for my experience in teambuilding trip i stand strongly agree that it was the take up way to quickly get in the new team. 3. Explain how role conflicts strength swipe from role perceptions differing from role expectations (try to give a real life example that you charter experienced). Personal example In higher(prenominal) school our student council (I was fresh member there) were organizing gigantic event. Leading group inform that everybody can join them and take an nimble part in developing it. I with other freshers had many interesting thoughts and expectations further how come up in the end we were ably only to participate in cleaning after the party.As a conduct we felt exploited and misunderstood what caused mammoth conflict between leading and new member s. 4. Explain how conformity and status of group members effects team work . consonance and status are very important part in group development. commonwealth are used to be gain by first impression. Members who have more experience, are more talented or more self-confident (have higher status than other) are used to be treated as a leaders or be more respected from the first minute. It can have both positive and negative effects through the group. It is important that despite status everybody would have equal redress to let out and realize themselves.Furthermore, People often conform from a desire for warranter within a grouptypically a group of a akin(predicate) age, culture, religion, or educational status. It can continue people from new ideas and innovation. 5. Explain why group viscidness can be both positive and negative for team performance Positive performance minus performance * Individuals are proud to be in the group and see group membership important. As a re solving they look seriously to the tasks, output and achievements of the group. * Members of viscous groups deal with conflict openly and constructively. They develop and share values and team loyality. sticking groups increase job satisfaction and focus stress. * When working toward a common address group members can fill in for each others need of knowledge or shortage of skill. * Teams members have scatency to need similar behaviors that became group norm what can couse lowered productivity or lack of creativity and innovation * Group-think. It happens when case-by-case group members lose the ability to think for themselves and swear on the group to arrange their decisions. * cohesive groups find it difficult to change their values, actions or behaviors, particularly when the change is driven by external forces. Opinions held by the majority or by key group members are regarded as unanimous and alternative views are discouraged 6. Answer the questions in the respectab le Dilemma page 255 1) If group members end up working around slackers, do you think this information should be faded to the teacher so that individuals plowshare to the project is judged more fairly? If so, does the group have an ethical responsibility to communicate this to the shirking group member? If not, isnt the shirking group member unfairly reaping the rewards of a free ride? personally I desire that decision have to be made based on situation.I think that first of all group has to try to identify the problem why the member is not working. Maybe he/she has personal problems and cant turn or he/she is not experienced enough that could face the task by himself. Furthermore, is very important to try to speak with the member and say your dissatisfaction directly rather of just throwing him out. If it doesnt work then group must to communicate with instructor. 2) Do you think confronting the shrinking group member is justified? Does this depend on the skills of shirker (we ather he is capable of doing good-quality work)?I guess that everything depends on situation and the task what members have to do. If person is able to do that exclusively just is trying to avoid the work than it is justified. 3) Social loafing has been found to be higher in Western, more individual nations, that other countries. Do you think this operator we should tolerate shirking in these countries to a commodiouser degree than if it occurred with whatsoeverone from more collectivistic nation? I think that social and cultural background has great influence to human character. This is the reason that group members have to be tolerant with each other and try to find the best working method. . Make case fortuity 2 page 256 1) What are some factors that led to groupthink in the cases described here? What can teams do to attempt to clog groupthink from occurring? People have tendency not to make quick and efficient decisions. They are trying to avoid conflicts in the team and are not making changes related with a work. They tend to strict to more traditional and safe decisions. I think that leader have to promote people to represent different ideas and not to be afraid of using different ways. 2) How cleverness differences in status among group members offer to groupthink?For example, how cleverness lover-status members react to groups decisions? Are lower-status members more or less(prenominal) likely to be fenders? Why might higher-status group members be more effective dissenters? Status has very big stupor through group members. Individuals with lower-status are tend to keep quietly and not make decisions. They pretend that situation is appropriate for them and company. Higher-status group members are mostly more nimble and innovative. 3) Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer says that he encourages dissent. Can such(prenominal) norms guard against the point of groupthink?As a manager, how would you try to cultivate norms that prevent groupthink? I pers onally believe that encouraging dissent is one of the best ways against the occurrence of groupthink. It stimulates people to think and come up with new ideas or improve the mature ones. I would choose the same way. 4) How might group characteristics such as size of it and cohesiveness affect groupthink? If group is very big and cohesive then it has big risk to be unsuccessful. People are not used to say their opinion or take action. I believe that smaller groups are working more efficient because they get more responsibilities.